CLAUDE CODE VS. AUGMENT CODE
Same Model. Better Context. Better Code.
CODE QUALITY BENCHMARK
Code quality that outperforms
Augment generated pull requests that matched or exceeded human code quality, significantly outperforming Claude Code. The code worked on first try, required no follow-up, and followed existing patterns instead of creating new ones.
Overall
Aggregate performance across functional correctness, style, and context awareness.
Correctness
Code executes as intended, passes tests, and handles edge cases without logical errors.
Completeness
Solution fully implements the requested feature scope, leaving no placeholders or TODOs.
Code Reuse
Intelligently leverages existing project utilities, types, and components to minimize technical debt.
Best Practice
Code matches the unique patterns, naming conventions, and architecture of the codebase.
Blind study comparing 500 agent-generated pull requests to merged code written by humans on the Elasticsearch repository — 3.6M Java LOC from 2,187 contributors
Same intelligence. Better context.
WHY AUGMENT
Why teams choose Augment Code
System-wide context
Index up to 1m+ files in real-time. Our Context Engine retrieves, ranks, and compresses relevant code without hitting token limits. You think about shipping, not context windows.
Respects your team's patterns
Augment learns from your team's code style, architectural decisions, and review feedback. Generate code that passes CI and matches your standards without manual cleanup.
Built for team workflows
Multi-repository refactoring. Slack integration. Customer-managed encryption. Augment works the way enterprise teams actually ship software.
Enterprise-Ready Security
INTELLIGENT CONTEXT CURATION
From millions of lines to exactly what matters
Signal over noise, automatically.
Our Context Engine doesn't dump your entire codebase into the prompt. It:
- •Retrieves only what matters for your request
- •Compresses context without losing critical information
- •Ranks and prioritizes based on relevance
- •Respects access permissions with proof of possession
Result: The Infinite Context Window. You don't think about tokens. You think about shipping.
Activity
Fig. 001—Code quality over session duration
FEATURE COMPARISON
Claude Code vs. Augment Code
“After 20 minutes, Copilot was going in circles and Claude Code's context had reset. Augment wrote the unit test suite in three minutes.”
GET STARTED
Stop evaluating. Start coding.
Thousands of engineers tried Cursor and Claude Code, then switched to Augment. See why in your first session.