Conducting a Java security code review aligned with OWASP patterns has become a mission-critical discipline for organizations that operate large-scale Java applications. By uniting the refreshed OWASP Top 10:2025 guidance with Spring Security 6.x best practices and always-on dependency scanning, teams in fintech, healthcare, and other highly regulated industries can demonstrate due diligence while dramatically reducing attack surface. Because the new OWASP list highlights Software Supply Chain Failures (A03) and Mishandling of Exceptional Conditions (A10), two categories that hit Java shops especially hard, enterprises must update review playbooks across every repository without delay.
A modern Java security code review does more than catch bad patterns in first-party classes; it also interrogates every imported library, every exception path, and every build pipeline. The result is audit-ready evidence that satisfies HIPAA, PCI-DSS, and similar frameworks while accelerating time-to-remediation.
TL;DR
Enterprise Java applications show an 86% vulnerability rate in open-source components, with 70% of critical security debt originating from third-party code rather than first-party classes. Conventional code reviews miss these supply chain risks because they focus on application logic while ignoring transitive dependencies and exception handling gaps. This guide demonstrates OWASP Top 10:2025-aligned security review patterns validated by Synopsys OSSRA 2025 analysis of nearly 1,000 commercial codebases.
Why a Java Security Code Review Needs OWASP Top 10:2025 Alignment
The OWASP Top 10:2025 updates the risk landscape for web applications, but there is no documented evidence yet that it has materially reshaped how Java teams specifically approach risk. Software Supply Chain Failures targets Maven and Gradle dependency chains that can include thousands of artifacts, while Mishandling of Exceptional Conditions exposes Java's try/catch gaps: empty blocks, unchecked resources, and leaked stack traces.
Regulated sectors amplify the urgency. Synopsys OSSRA 2025 reports 87% high-risk vulnerability prevalence in fintech code and 80% in healthcare systems. Those figures prove a modern Java security code review must extend well beyond first-party classes to every imported library and every exception path.
Teams using Augment Code's Context Engine cut vulnerability triage time by 5–10× because the platform reasons over 400,000+ files, mapping dependency graphs and exception flows in one pass.
Context Engine scans 400,000+ files for end-to-end security pattern detection. Explore Augment Code →
OWASP Top 10:2025 Guide for Enterprise-Grade Java Security Code Review
Java platforms must address all OWASP Top 10:2025 categories. The table below highlights the six categories most critical to Java security code reviews, with laser focus on the two new entries: Software Supply Chain Failures (A03) and Mishandling of Exceptional Conditions (A10). SSRF now lives under A01 Broken Access Control. A06–A09 also apply but overlap with practices and tooling addressed elsewhere in this guide.
| OWASP Top 10:2025 Category | Java Impact | Review Focus |
|---|---|---|
| A01 Broken Access Control | Spring Security misconfigurations, SSRF | @PreAuthorize, path traversal, IDOR |
| A02 Security Misconfiguration | Exposed Actuator, verbose errors, default creds | Prod profiles, headers (X-Frame-Options, CSP, HSTS) |
| A03 Software Supply Chain Failures | Maven/Gradle deps, transitive vulns, poisoned pkgs | SCA, SBOM, repository firewall |
| A04 Cryptographic Failures | Weak algos (MD5, SHA-1, DES), bad JCA use | AES-256-GCM, SHA-256+, key mgmt, SecureRandom |
| A05 Injection | SQL/JPA, XXE, LDAP, command | Prepared statements, parser hardening, query linting |
| A10 Mishandling of Exceptional Conditions | Empty catch, resource leaks, trace exposure | Robust handlers, cleanup, sanitized errors |
Spring Security 6.x Patterns That Satisfy OWASP
Spring Security 6.x, which ships with Spring Boot 3.x, swaps out the old WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter for a fluent SecurityFilterChain.
Key review hotspots:
• CSRF token handling for stateless APIs.
• Comprehensive CSP directives.
• HSTS preload readiness.
• migrateSession() to thwart fixation without breaking auth workflows.
Using Augment Code for Spring Security migrations boosts configuration verification speed, leveraging a 70.6% SWE-bench accuracy across intricate auth flows. Teams managing enterprise coding standards benefit from consistent security pattern enforcement across repositories.
Dependency Scanning and Software Supply Chain Security for Java Reviews
A03 demands nonstop monitoring. OWASP Dependency-Check offers a free Maven/Gradle plugin, Snyk supplies IDE plugins for local vulnerability scanning and fix recommendations while its PR automation is SCM-centric, and Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle layers in VEX-driven prioritization plus repository firewalls.
Implement severity gates:
• Critical = block all deploys.
• High = block only if newly introduced.
• Medium = allow deploy, require fix by SLA.
For teams integrating dependency scanning into CI/CD pipelines, automated severity gates prevent vulnerable code from reaching production.
Augment Code's Context Engine maps 14,097+ Maven relationships, delivering 70.6% SWE-bench precision. Explore Augment Code →
HIPAA & PCI-DSS Mapping Through OWASP-Aligned Java Security Code Review
Aligning a Java security code review with OWASP Top 10:2025 makes compliance evidence straightforward. Teams building AI governance frameworks can extend these mappings to cover emerging AI-specific compliance requirements.
| Regulatory Requirement | OWASP Top 10:2025 Category | Java Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| PCI-DSS Req 6 | A03, A04, A05 | Dependency scans, crypto review |
| PCI-DSS Req 8 | A07 | Spring Security MFA, session mgmt |
| HIPAA §164.312(a) | A01 | @PreAuthorize + ownership checks |
| HIPAA §164.312(b) | A09 | Audit log coverage |
| HIPAA §164.312(e) | A04, A02 | TLS 1.2+, strong encryption |
Augment Code automates the evidence gathering, surfacing code snippets tied to each requirement for auditors.
Enterprise Java Security Code Review Workflow
OWASP recommends blending automated SAST with manual deep dives. Focus manual review on business logic and auth flows. Understanding static code analysis best practices helps teams maximize SAST effectiveness.
Pull request security checklist:
• Spring Security 6.x SecurityFilterChain patterns in place
• @PreAuthorize with ownership validation
• All queries use PreparedStatement or JPA named params
• XML parsers disable DOCTYPE/XXE
• AES-256-GCM plus SecureRandom for crypto
• No empty catch blocks; sanitized errors only
• Sensitive logs scrub PII/PHI
Set a sprint-aligned cadence, prioritizing auth, payment, and PHI modules before audit windows. Augment Code links patterns across the whole repo so reviewers see context instantly.
What to Do Next
An effective Java security code review benefits from a layered strategy: aligning with OWASP Top 10:2025, migrating to Spring Security 6.x SecurityFilterChain, and automating SCA in appropriate pipelines. These are recommended practices rather than universal requirements. Enforce severity-based gates, blocking critical/high issues, and track remediation on legacy debt.
Context Engine correlates auth, crypto, and audit code across 400,000+ files. Explore Augment Code →
FAQ
Related
Written by

Molisha Shah
GTM and Customer Champion
