Google Antigravity vs Windsurf: Which AI Coding Assistant Is Ready for Enterprise?

After testing both tools extensively on enterprise codebases, I found Windsurf delivers production-ready capabilities with multi-IDE plugin support and SOC 2 Type II compliance, while Google Antigravity remains in preview with documented stability issues and critical security vulnerabilities that security researchers say require careful configuration before enterprise use. The maturity gap between these tools is significant: one is ready for production deployment, the other is not.

Augment Code's Context Engine provides enterprise-grade multi-repository support with semantic dependency analysis, achieving 70.6% SWE-bench performance. Explore enterprise capabilities →

Evaluating AI coding assistants for enterprise teams managing legacy codebases requires looking beyond marketing claims. I examined both Google Antigravity and Windsurf across representative enterprise scenarios: multi-repository context handling, IDE integration workflows, and large-scale refactoring tasks.

My technical analysis revealed a fundamental insight about this comparison. According to technical analysis by Kilo Blog, Google Antigravity is described as a literal fork of the Windsurf codebase with Google branding and Gemini model integration, fundamentally changing this comparison from "independent products" to "architectural variations."

In practice, the fork relationship matters less than operational divergence. Antigravity functions as a standalone IDE only, with zero plugin integrations for VSCode, JetBrains, or Vim, while Windsurf offers comprehensive plugins across multiple IDEs. Teams are choosing between operationally distinct models: complete IDE replacement (Antigravity) versus 2-minute plugin installation (Windsurf), alongside model preferences (Gemini versus multi-model flexibility).

The maturity disparity is significant. Windsurf demonstrates production readiness with Gartner Leader recognition (2025 Magic Quadrant for AI Code Assistants) and documented enterprise features. Antigravity remains in preview with documented stability issues, including model overload errors and application crashes.

Google Antigravity and Windsurf: Core Capabilities

One tool is a Windsurf fork with Google branding that launched in November 2025 and can't integrate with your existing IDE. The other has Gartner Leader recognition and a 2-minute plugin installation. That maturity gap defined everything I discovered during the evaluation.

Google Antigravity operates as a standalone VS Code-based IDE using Gemini models with a 2-million-token context window. The Agent Manager enables multi-agent task orchestration with parallel agent coordination. I found critical limitations: no plugin integrations with existing IDEs, limited extension compatibility to the Open VSX marketplace, and the inability to use Microsoft extensions like theC# Dev Kit due to licensing restrictions. The platform contains critical security gaps, including a persistent code execution vulnerability documented by Mindgard.ai researchers.

Windsurf provides a production-ready AI IDE with Cascade agent and RAG-based indexing for codebase context. The plugin architecture offers native integrations for VSCode, JetBrains IDEs, Vim/Neovim, and Visual Studio that integrate directly into existing development environments. Remote repository indexing for Teams and Enterprise tiers addresses multi-repository requirements. The Singapore Government Portal officially endorses Windsurf for government developers, confirming enterprise-grade integration standards.

Google Antigravity vs Windsurf: Why This Comparison Matters in 2026

The actual question for enterprise deployment isn't which tool generates perfect code, it's which tool's review workflow and reliability constraints align with your team's oversight capacity and production requirements.

Antigravity's review model is fundamentally limited: developers review code when the agent determines it's ready, not on developer-defined schedules. Windsurf has been described positively in Gartner Peer Insights excerpts, though concerns about reliability and context handling have been raised in third-party reviews and anecdotal user reports.

Neither tool eliminates the need for senior engineering oversight. Both require extensive review processes for generated code, though the nature and effectiveness of oversight differ significantly.

Google Antigravity vs Windsurf: Feature Comparison at a Glance

This comparison reflects documented evidence from authoritative sources, including official documentation, security research, and verified enterprise review platforms.

IDE Integration: Complete Replacement vs. Plugin Installation

The deployment model difference has critical implications for enterprise teams. Antigravity cannot be piloted by a subset of developers without forcing a full IDE migration, as it operates exclusively as a standalone application.

IDE Integration Comparison

Google Antigravity requires a complete IDE replacement. Developer migration from VSCode to Antigravity reveals notable friction, including an incomplete settings import and the inability to use Microsoft extensions such as the C# Dev Kit due to licensing restrictions.

Windsurf's plugin architecture takes a different approach. I found that installing a VSCode plugin through the official VSCode Marketplace takes approximately 2 minutes. The plugins preserve existing development workflows by operating as extensions within developers' preferred environments rather than requiring adoption of a standalone IDE.

Teams using heterogeneous IDE environments (VSCode for frontend, JetBrains for backend) face a significant integration gap with Antigravity. According to official documentation, Antigravity offers zero plugin integrations, while Windsurf provides comprehensive plugin support for multiple platforms.

Security Posture: Critical Vulnerabilities vs. Enterprise Compliance

For enterprise environments where AI agents access sensitive codebases, credentials, and production systems, security posture is critical. The security gap between these tools proved substantial during my evaluation.

Security Comparison

The Mindgard.ai security research team documented a persistent code-execution vulnerability that exploits Antigravity's trusted workspace model and enables a persistent backdoor for arbitrary code execution across sessions. The trust dialog fails to adequately represent the severity of achievable impact; the vulnerability allows agents to write to global configuration directories, enabling persistent attack vectors that survive application restarts.

Antigravity's currently demonstrated vulnerabilities represent a significant risk until Google's remediation is independently verified.

Augment Code's Context Engine provides enterprise security controls without documented critical vulnerabilities, offering an alternative for security-conscious teams. Review enterprise security options →

Multi-Repository Context: RAG-Based Indexing vs. Agent-Based Approach

Testing multi-repository handling capabilities revealed substantial architectural differences. Windsurf provides RAG-based indexing specifically optimized for codebase context, while Antigravity takes an agent-based approach without documented multi-repository support.

Context Architecture Comparison

Windsurf's retrieval-augmented generation provides full local indexing, graph-based understanding through the Cascade system, and multi-file reasoning with dependency tracking. For Teams and Enterprise users, Windsurf can also index remote repositories, directly addressing multi-repository requirements.

Google Antigravity's 1 million token context window takes an agent-based approach to task delegation rather than implementing traditional multi-repository context aggregation. I found no technical details on cross-repository context aggregation in the official documentation.

The architectural difference becomes critical for teams managing microservice architectures with shared libraries.

Multi-Agent Orchestration: Parallel Agents vs. Collaborative Assistance

Antigravity's Agent Manager enables spawning multiple agent threads and assigning different tasks to separate agents. However, I discovered significant coordination limitations during hands-on testing.

Workflow Philosophy Comparison

Reddit developers identified the challenge of "creating tests for a file at the same time as it's being refactored, by two separate agents who are unaware of each other." These agent coordination failures create code integrity risks that require careful orchestration strategies.

Windsurf's Cascade agent provides collaborative assistance rather than autonomous orchestration. The workflow feels more predictable: developers maintain control over code review timing and approval cadence. One limitation documented by CodeAnt.ai is that developers cannot chat while Cascade actively generates code.

Enterprise Pricing: Transparent vs. Undocumented

Windsurf provides transparent pricing through official documentation: $10/month for the Pro tier, $60/user/month for the Enterprise tier with 1,000 monthly credits, and an SSO support add-on at $10/user/month.

Google Antigravity's enterprise pricing model remains undocumented. The product integrates with Google Workspace AI Ultra for Business subscriptions, but specific per-user costs are not publicly available. During preview, the platform is freely accessible, but post-preview pricing structures remain unconfirmed.

Google Antigravity vs Windsurf: Which Tool Fits Your Team?

Based on hands-on testing across enterprise scenarios, security research review, and official documentation analysis, here are the recommendations.

Choose Google Antigravity if:

• You operate in controlled experimental environments and accept documented stability issues
• You value multi-agent orchestration with parallel agent coordination (with documented concerns)
• You exclusively use standalone IDE environments and can migrate away from existing IDEs
• You accept critical vulnerabilities until remediation is verified
• You're willing to wait for enterprise documentation and pricing

Do not choose Antigravity for production enterprise environments until the security posture is fully evaluated and comprehensive enterprise documentation becomes available.

Choose Windsurf if:

• You require multi-IDE support (VSCode, JetBrains, Vim/Neovim)
• You need multi-repository context awareness for distributed architectures
• You require transparent pricing for budget planning
• You prioritize production-ready security with SOC 2 Type II compliance
• You prefer a gradual rollout without forcing simultaneous IDE migration
• You accept that instruction-following limitations require senior engineer review

Consider Augment Code if:

• You need enterprise-grade multi-repository support without Antigravity's security vulnerabilities
• You require semantic dependency analysis for large codebases
• You want an alternative approach to codebase understanding through Context Engine analysis

The Maturity Gap Enterprise Teams Can't Ignore

Windsurf demonstrates the strongest readiness for immediate enterprise deployment. Production readiness, documented enterprise features, multi-IDE support, and the absence of critical security vulnerabilities create a defensible choice for organizations requiring AI coding assistance today.

Google Antigravity should not be deployed in enterprise environments until the critical vulnerability documented by Mindgard.ai is remediated and independently verified. The multi-agent orchestration capabilities represent a distinct architectural approach, but preview-stage stability issues, undocumented enterprise features, and critical security gaps make it unsuitable for production use.

For teams whose requirements include both multi-repository context and enterprise security, Augment Code's Context Engine provides semantic dependency graph analysis, achieving 70.6% SWE-bench accuracy without the security concerns affecting Antigravity or the instruction-following limitations affecting Windsurf.

Schedule enterprise demo →

Related Guides

• Cline vs Cursor AI Coding Tools
• Codex 2.0 vs Cursor vs Copilot CLI
• Context Engine vs RAG Technical Comparison
• GitHub Copilot vs Cursor
• Cursor vs Sourcegraph Cody