Windsurf vs JetBrains AI: scaffolding, and extension ecosystems

Windsurf and JetBrains AI both wrap the same foundation models, but their approaches couldn't be more different. Windsurf built a conversation-first IDE from scratch - minimalist interface, every chat exportable as Markdown for code reviews, and Cascade agents that can generate and deduplicate unit tests with a single prompt. JetBrains bolted AI assistance onto their existing IDE ecosystem, keeping the dense, shortcut-heavy workflows that power users already know.

The testing gap is telling: Windsurf's Cascade can analyze legacy code, generate comprehensive test suites, and execute them automatically. JetBrains AI offers inline test suggestions within familiar frameworks like JUnit and Pytest, but no dedicated scaffolding automation. Integration-wise, Windsurf ships with 40-plus connectors for modern cloud services, while JetBrains wins on marketplace depth and enterprise plugin management.

This analysis draws from Reddit engineering discussions, competitor breakdowns, and vendor documentation to help you pick the right tool for your team's workflow and existing tooling investments.

Quick Snapshot

Windsurf took VS Code, stripped out the complexity, and built an agentic chat interface on top. Every conversation exports to Markdown, which sounds trivial until you're trying to trace why the AI suggested a particular refactor three weeks ago. The tool runs what it calls "safe commands" - basically git operations, test runs, and deployments - without asking permission each time. Deep integrations pull design files from Figma or push to Stripe's API directly from the editor, eliminating the usual context switching that kills momentum during feature development.

JetBrains AI works differently. It plugs into IntelliJ's existing context engine, so it already knows your project structure, dependencies, and code patterns before you ask it anything. The AI suggestions appear inline with your existing shortcuts and workflows intact. Nothing you write gets stored or fed back into training models, which matters when you're working on proprietary codebases. You keep the familiar JetBrains interface density - all those panels and tools that power users rely on - while gaining AI-driven completions and refactors.

The comparison ahead focuses on three areas that actually matter for shipping code: how quickly your team can onboard with each editor, how well they handle automated test generation, and whether their plugin ecosystems solve real problems or just add bloat.

Editor Ergonomics

Windsurf opens to a clean interface - no toolbar chaos, no competing panels demanding attention. The design prioritizes code over chrome, with review panes appearing only when needed. Every AI conversation persists in exportable Markdown threads, which proves useful when you need to document architectural decisions or walk through refactoring logic with your team. Real-time previews, automatic linting, and memory tracking run quietly in the background, surfacing problems without interrupting flow. The result: new developers start contributing in minutes rather than hours spent hunting through menus.

JetBrains AI builds on the interface developers already know from IntelliJ, PyCharm, or WebStorm. Tool windows, inspection indicators, and keyboard shortcuts remain exactly where experienced users expect them. The AI assistant integrates into this established workflow, providing project-wide insights - method usage patterns, dependency analysis, build configuration suggestions - without forcing you to leave the editor. For teams already invested in JetBrains tooling, this continuity keeps velocity high.

However, newcomers often spend their first week learning where everything lives, and AI responses can bog down on large codebases, disrupting development flow.

The ergonomic choice depends on your team's existing expertise. If you need rapid onboarding or prefer conversation-driven development, Windsurf's minimal interface and persistent chat history deliver immediate productivity. If your developers live in JetBrains IDEs and rely on deep code inspection and established keyboard shortcuts, JetBrains AI maintains their existing productivity patterns without retraining overhead.

Test Scaffolding & Automation

Any engineer with a decade-old codebase knows the pain: writing tests for functions you barely remember is brutal work. Both Windsurf's Cascade agent and JetBrains AI tackle this problem, but they take completely different approaches to automation.

Windsurf goes full automation. Cascade reads your project context, builds "memories" of previous commands, then walks the repo hunting for coverage gaps. Ask it to scaffold tests for a creaky payments module, and the flow feels almost conversational: Cascade inspects the file, proposes a test plan, strips duplicates, and - because the command is flagged as safe - drops the new test file directly into your tree without another prompt. A typical demo shows an entire Jest suite appearing in under 20 seconds while the IDE quietly runs npm test in the background, all orchestrated by the agent's terminal integration and rule engine.

# tests/test_payments.py
import pytest
from payments import calculate_total, process_refund

def test_calculate_total_with_tax():
    assert calculate_total(100.00, 0.0825) == 108.25

def test_process_refund_valid_amount():
    result = process_refund('txn_123', 50.00)
    assert result['status'] == 'success'
    assert result['refund_id'].startswith('ref_')

Cascade remembers your project uses Pytest instead of unittest, so it wires the right imports and fixtures automatically. Migrate to Playwright for end-to-end coverage tomorrow, and the agent notices the new dev dependency and switches templates without being told.

JetBrains AI stays within IDE boundaries. Highlight a method, hit "Generate Test," and you get a perfectly formatted JUnit or Pytest stub. Inline suggestions help fill assertions, and the scaffolding hooks into IntelliJ inspections, so refactors propagate automatically. What you don't get is redundancy pruning, project-wide memory, or one-click execution of auxiliary commands - every change waits for your approval.

The choice comes down to your workflow preferences. Need end-to-end automation with tests generated, deduped, and run while you grab coffee? Windsurf's Cascade has the clear advantage. Prefer conservative, IDE-native assistance that fits established review workflows? JetBrains AI's incremental scaffolding feels safer.

Extension & Plugin Ecosystem

When you pick an AI coding tool, the real deciding factor often isn't the assistant itself - it's everything that plugs into it. Integrations dictate whether day-to-day work feels seamless or stitched together with scripts and copy-paste.

Windsurf meets you wherever you code. The platform ships plugins for more than 40 editors - IntelliJ, VS Code, Vim, Jupyter, even Xcode - so you can keep your preferred workflow and still get AI help. A dedicated plugin hub lets teams roll out or lock down extensions centrally, essential for regulated environments.

Beyond editors, Windsurf exposes pre-built connectors for tools teams already use: Slack workflow bots, Figma design-to-code helpers, GitHub, Stripe, Postgres, Playwright, and Neon. Those connectors feed into "AI Flows," which chain tasks - run tests, post screenshots to Slack, open a pull request - without leaving the IDE. Because Cascade agents can call tools directly, autocomplete and code generation stay context-aware across services.

JetBrains counters with sheer scale: its Marketplace hosts thousands of extensions spanning languages, frameworks, and niche developer needs. Every plugin inherits deep IDE hooks - inspections, refactorings, run configurations - so features feel native rather than bolted on. Enterprises can mirror the Marketplace internally, pin plugin versions, and enforce signed updates. For teams that already live inside IntelliJ-based IDEs, adding the AI Assistant is one checkbox in the same settings panel they use for Lombok or JUnit templates.

JetBrains wins on breadth and polish; its Marketplace has a mature extension for almost every corner case you can imagine. Windsurf fires back with wider editor coverage and AI-first integrations that wire design, code, and ops into one conversational workflow. Which matters more depends on whether you value depth inside one IDE or flexibility across many.

Strengths & Limitations

Every tool trades power for complexity. After testing both Windsurf and JetBrains AI on the same monorepo, here's where each one clearly wins - and where it breaks down.

Windsurf Strengths:

• Cascade agent analyzes files, scaffolds tests, and deletes redundant cases in one shot
• Interface stays intentionally sparse - Apple-like panels instead of modal chaos
• Export entire chat history to Markdown for pull-request discussions
• Real-time collaboration rounds out a strong remote-first setup

Windsurf Limitations:

• Plugin catalog is still thin compared to JetBrains' decade-old marketplace
• Power users accustomed to tuning every inspection profile will find the "sane defaults" philosophy limiting
• Teams already invested in JetBrains shortcuts face IDE migration costs

JetBrains AI Strengths:

• Drops into tooling most enterprise teams already run
• Thousands of vetted plugins - database explorers, observability dashboards, custom linters
• Assistant leverages IntelliJ's project-wide index for surgically precise refactors
• Code snippets aren't stored or reused for model training

JetBrains AI Limitations:

• No Cascade-style end-to-end test workflows
• Newcomers drown in tool windows
• AI responses can stall on large projects
• Conversation history stays trapped in the IDE pane

Need out-of-the-box automation and transparent collaboration? Windsurf's opinionated minimalism wins. Team already breathes JetBrains keybindings and demands plugins for everything? Stick with the heavyweight.

Best-Fit Scenarios

Choose Windsurf if:

• You need to get a brand-new team moving fast with minimal UI friction
• Markdown-exportable chat history and transparent collaboration matter
• End-to-end test automation saves more time than manual scaffolding
• Your team works across multiple editors and needs consistent AI assistance
• Aggressive automation and "safe commands" fit your development style

Choose JetBrains AI if:

• Your team already lives in IntelliJ, PyCharm, or WebStorm
• Thousands of existing plugins are critical to your workflow
• Granular refactoring power and deep code inspection are non-negotiable
• Strict data-handling guarantees (no code storage/training) are required
• Conservative, IDE-native assistance fits your review processes better

Teams have reported productivity improvements with both tools, but the context matters. A security-focused financial firm sitting on a decade-old Java monolith will feel at home in JetBrains AI, where the assistant speaks JUnit natively and respects keyboard shortcuts senior developers already know.

Distributed teams working async benefit from Windsurf's shareable conversation logs and project-wide "memories," making it easy for colleagues in different time zones to pick up the thread. DevOps architects appreciate the same agent's ability to run container builds or install missing test frameworks autonomously.

Comparison Summary

Windsurf vs JetBrains

Conclusion & Recommendation

The choice between Windsurf and JetBrains AI comes down to matching your team's current reality rather than chasing theoretical features. Windsurf's conversation-first interface gets new team members productive faster, while JetBrains AI keeps existing power users in their comfort zone.

The testing story is clearer. Cascade's automated test generation and redundancy pruning handles the full loop from stub to execution. JetBrains treats test generation as an assist feature within the IDE, requiring more manual orchestration. If you're drowning in legacy code that needs test coverage, Windsurf's approach saves measurable time.

Ecosystem depth still favors JetBrains heavily. Their plugin marketplace has thousands of specialized tools teams probably already depend on. Windsurf's integration catalog is growing but can't match that breadth yet.

For teams evaluating both platforms: Run a two-week pilot with each tool. Track developer satisfaction scores, test coverage delta, and time-to-productivity for new hires. If Windsurf's conversation exports and automated testing move those numbers meaningfully, that's your signal. If your team is already deep in JetBrains workflows and plugins, the incremental upgrade to JetBrains AI is the safer bet.

Both platforms are iterating fast, so expect feature parity within two years. Choose based on what delivers results for your specific team today, then reassess as the landscape shifts.

Ready to Streamline Your Development Workflow?

While Windsurf and JetBrains AI each offer compelling approaches to AI-assisted development, the choice often comes down to working within the constraints of existing tooling and team preferences. But what if you didn't have to choose between conversation-driven automation and deep IDE integration?

Try Augment Code - the comprehensive AI development platform that combines the best of both worlds. Get intelligent conversation flows that export to Markdown for team collaboration, plus deep IDE integrations that work across any development environment. Experience automated test scaffolding that understands your existing patterns, comprehensive plugin ecosystems, and enterprise-grade security - all in one unified platform.

No more forcing your team into a single IDE philosophy or accepting half-measures on automation. Start your free trial today and discover what happens when AI development tools are built to adapt to your workflow, not the other way around.